LEGISLATION IS INTRODUCED TO PROTECT UNMARRIED COHABITANTS Essay

LEGISLATION IS INTRODUCED TO PROTECT UNMARRIED COHABITANTS - Essay sheathUnder the Children mask 1989, an unmarried mother has the sole paternal responsibility everywhere her children however this was amend under the bankers acceptance and Children Act 2002 where p arntal responsibility shall be acquired by the catch if he is registered as the childs father there is a parental responsibility organisation or when the speak to orders that he shall make believe parental authority upon his application.Under the Children Act 1989, an unmarried mother has the sole parental responsibility over her children however this was amended under the Adoption and Children Act 2002 where parental responsibility shall be acquired by the father if he is registered as the childs father there is a parental responsibility agreement or when the court orders that he shall have parental authority upon his application. The legislative authorization defend cohabitation may be used by couples who are prescribed by law to tie by rea watchword of legal impediment or public policy to circumvent the law. A show window in invest is B & L v the United Kingdom where a parent-in-law is prohibited from marrying their child-in-law unless both had reached aged 21 and both their respective spouses had died. B was Ls father-in-law, and they wished to marry. Ls son treated his grandfather, B, as Dad. However, upon application to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), it was ruled that the prohibition violates the right(a) to marry further its laudable and legitimate aim of protecting the family and any children of the couple. The prohibition was based generally on tradition and considering the same situation, no legal prohibition exists when the couple would engage in an extra-marital relationship. In fine, there are enough laws to protect the interest of unmarried cohabitants. They must only be hawk-eyed in protecting their rights and interests so that they may not be unduly dep rived of their rights and interests.... Under the Children Act 1989, an unmarried mother has the sole parental responsibility over her children however this was amended under the Adoption and Children Act 2002 where parental responsibility shall be acquired by the father if he is registered as the childs father there is a parental responsibility agreement or when the court orders that he shall have parental authority upon his application.Under the Children Act 1989, an unmarried mother has the sole parental responsibility over her children however this was amended under the Adoption and Children Act 2002 where parental responsibility shall be acquired by the father if he is registered as the childs father there is a parental responsibility agreement or when the court orders that he shall have parental authority upon his application. The legislative pronouncement protecting cohabitation may be used by couples who are prescribed by law to marry by sympathy of legal impediment or publ ic policy to circumvent the law. A case in point is B & L v the United Kingdom where a parent-in-law is prohibited from marrying their child-in-law unless both had reached aged 21 and both their respective spouses had died. B was Ls father-in-law, and they wished to marry. Ls son treated his grandfather, B, as Dad. However, upon application to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), it was ruled that the prohibition violates the right to marry notwithstanding its laudable and legitimate aim of protecting the family and any children of the couple. The prohibition was based primarily on tradition and considering the same situation, no legal prohibition exists when the couple would engage in an extra-marital relationship. In fine, there are enough laws to protect the interest of unmarried cohabitants. They must only be vigilant in protecting their rights and interests so that they may not be unduly deprived of their rights and interests. Any legislation that would be enacted would bewilder the cohabitation relationship at par with coupling and courteous partnership is a mockery to the institutions. It would further decay marriage and civil partnership and from the growing number of couples choosing to cohabit without the benefit of marriage or civil partnership, it is marriage and civil partnership that need protection. Unmarried cohabitation should be left alone to give the parties freedom to choose but they cannot invoke protection as this is a direct assault on the institutions of marriage and civil partnership.